The relevance of this study stems from the rapid development of generative technologies that enable the creation of heavily modified or fully synthesised content using artificial intelligence, particularly deepfakes. Such content not only creates an illusion of authenticity but also poses a threat to the protection of intellectual property rights and personal non-property rights, giving rise to significant legal challenges in the digital environment. The aim of the article was to formulate and justify civil-law approaches to the regulation of deepfake content usage in the context of copyright and personal data protection, considering the challenges of society’s digital transformation. The study employed methods of systems analysis, legal-logical generalisation, formal legal method, and comparative legal research, considering international norms and doctrinal sources. It was established that current Ukrainian legislation does not define deepfake content as a separate legal category, and existing legal mechanisms are fragmented and do not cover all aspects of responsibility for its creation and distribution. Gaps were identified in the regulation of derivative digital works, the protection of biometric features of individuals, and the procedures for identifying violators in the context of automated content generation. The study proved that without proper regulatory response, deepfake technologies may be used as tools of manipulation, identity forgery, and digital defamation. The research emphasised the need for an interdisciplinary approach that integrates legal, technical, and ethical aspects of deepfake regulation. Special attention was given to legal liability in cases of automated content creation without direct human authorship. The importance of digital transparency and informed consent was highlighted as key principles of legal regulation. The results of the study can be used to improve national legislation and to develop international legal mechanisms in the field of artificial intelligence
Civil-law aspects of using deepfake content in the context of copyright and personal data protection
Abstract
Keywords
digital environment; artificial origin; automated creation; digital transformation; synthetic media manipulation
- Afshari, N., & Mohammadi, A. (2023). The legal implications of deepfake technology: Privacy, defamation, and the challenge of regulating synthetic media. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 2(2), 13-23.
- Allyn, B. (2022). Deepfake video of Zelenskyy could be “tip of the iceberg” in info war, experts warn. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2022/03/16/1087062648/deepfake-video-zelenskyy-experts-war-manipulationukraine-russia.
- Apolo, Y., & Michael, K. (2024). Beyond a reasonable doubt? Audiovisual evidence, AI manipulation, deepfakes, and the law. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 5(2), 156-168. doi: 10.1109/TTS.2024.3427816.
- Aristova, I., Rezvorovich, K., Sydorova, E., Nesterchuk, L., & Kislitsyna, I. (2020). Creation of an intellectual property court in Ukraine: Protection of intellectual property rights in a system of economic security of a country. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 9, 362-380. doi: 10.9770/jssi.2020.9.m(29).
- Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. (1979, September). Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne/.
- Busacca, A., & Monaca, M.A. (2023). Deepfake: Creation, purpose, risks. In D. Marino & M.A. Monaca (Eds.), Innovations and economic and social changes due to artificial intelligence: The state of the art (pp. 55-68). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-33461-0_6.
- Civil Code of Ukraine. (2003, January). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text.
- CNIL. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.cnil.fr/fr.
- Code of Relations Between the Public and the Administration. (2024, July). Retrieved from https://www. legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000031366350/.
- EU Data Protection Authorities (DPA). (2024). Retrieved from https://www.enforcementtracker.com/.
- Fabuyi, J., Olaniyi, O.O., Olateju, O., Aideyan, N.T., Selesi-Aina, O., & Olaniyi, F.G. (2024). Deepfake regulations and their impact on content creation in the entertainment industry. Archives of Current Research International, 24(12), 52-74. doi: 10.9734/acri/2024/v24i12997.
- German Civil Code. (2002, January). Retrieved from https://surl.li/zqggxo.
- Heugas, A.C. (2021). Protecting image rights in the face of digitalisation: A United States and European analysis. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 24(5-6), 344-367. doi: 10.1111/jwip.12194.
- Ivkova, V., & Opirskyi, I. (2024). Research on the problem of ensuring personal data and confidential information security in the context of OSINT counteraction. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technology, 26(2), 189-199. doi: 10.28925/2663-4023.2024.26.682.
- Jasserand, C. (2024). Deceptive deepfakes: Is the law coping with AI-altered representations of ourselves? In 2024 international conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG) (pp. 1-4). Darmstadt: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/BIOSIG61931.2024.10786729.
- Kugler, M.B., & Pace, C. (2021). Deepfake privacy: Attitudes and regulation. Northwestern University Law Review, 116(3), 611-652. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3781968.
- Kulchytskyi, T., Rezvorovych, K., Povalena, M., Dutchak, S., & Kramar, R. (2024). Legal regulation of cybersecurity in the context of the digital transformation of Ukrainian society. Lex Humana, 16(1), 443-460.
- Law of Ukraine No. 2297-VI “On Personal Data Protection”. (2010, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/2297-17#Text.
- Law of Ukraine No. 2811-IX “On Copyright and Related Rights”. (2022, December). Retrieved from https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2811-20#Text.
- Lee, A., & Woo, P. (2022). Copyright law should stay true to itself in the age of artificial intelligence. In R. Abbot (Ed.), Research handbook on intellectual property and artificial intelligence (pp. 179-197). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781800881907.00015.
- Mania, K. (2024). Legal protection of revenge and deepfake porn victims in the European Union: Findings from a comparative legal study. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(1), 117-129. doi: 10.1177/15248380221143772.
- Meskys, E., Kalpokienė, J., Jurcys, P., & Liaudanskas, A. (2020). Regulating deep fakes: Legal and ethical considerations. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 15(1), 24-31. doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpz167.
- Murray, M.D. (2024). Deceptive exploitation: Deepfakes, the rights of publicity and privacy, and trademark law. IDEA: The Law Review of the Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property, 65(2), 124-210. doi: 10.2139/ ssrn.4981531.
- Petrovskyi, A., Kуrdan, B., & Kutsyk, K. (2025). Implementation of artificial intelligence in civil proceedings: Experience of EU countries. Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 30(1), 45-59. doi: 10.63341/naia-herald/1.2025.45.
- Reface. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://reface.ai/.
- Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council No. 2016/679 “On the Protection of Natural Persons With Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation)”. (2016, April). Retrieved from https://eur-lex. europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj.
- Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council No. 2021/0106 “On Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts”. (2021, April). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206.
- Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council No. 2022/2065 “On a Single Market for Digital Services and Amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act)”. (2022, October). Retrieved from https:// eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj.
- Romero Moreno, F. (2024). Generative AI and deepfakes: A human rights approach to tackling harmful content. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 38(3), 297-326. doi: 10.1080/13600869.2024.2324540.
- Screen Rant. (2019). Retrieved from https://screenrant.com/star-wars-9-carrie-fisher-footage/.
- Tyagi, K. (2023). Deepfakes, copyright and personality rights: An inter-disciplinary perspective. In Law and economics of the digital transformation. ILEC 2023. Economic analysis of law in European legal scholarship (pp. 191-210). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-25059-0_9.
- U.S. Congress Act No. H.R.5586 “Deepfakes Accountability Act”. (2023, September). Retrieved from https:// www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/5586.
- Van der Sloot, B., & Wagensveld, Y. (2022). Deepfakes: Regulatory challenges for the synthetic society. Computer Law & Security Review, 46, article number 105716. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105716.
- WIPO Copyright Treaty. (1996, December). Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/.
- WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty. (1996, December). Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/ treaties/en/ip/wppt/.
- Wróbel, A. (2024). Can GDPR and copyright law stop deepfake? A comprehensive legal analysis of the deepfake phenomenon and liability for the deepfake in the Polish legal system. Młody Jurysta, 1, 22-39. doi: 10.21697/ mj.14572.
- Zavadskyi, A.A. (2023). On the legal regulation of artificial intelligence for deep content synthesis and deepfakes: European experience and prospects for its application in Ukraine. In Integration of higher education of Ukraine into the European educational space in the conditions of martial law (pp. 69-72). Lomza-Kharkiv: MANS.
Rezvorovych, K.
(2025).
Civil-law aspects of using deepfake content in the context of copyright and personal data protection.
Philosophy, Economics and Law Review,
5(2),
8-16.
https://doi.org/10.63341/2786-491X-2025-2-08