The growing international interest in the polygraph, driven by both law enforcement demand and commercial incentives, has led to an overstated perception of its evidentiary value in legal proceedings. The purpose of this paper was to determine, based on the analysis of regulatory legal acts, academic publications, national judicial practice, and European Court of Human Rights decisions, the criteria for using the polygraph in proving as one of the methods of forensic psychological examination. The study applied a range of general scientific and legal research methods, including: the system-structural method for analysing the field of criminal proceedings and the practice of using the polygraph; historical and dialectical methods to examine the evolution of academic approaches to polygraph application; the logical-semantic method to clarify key concepts; and the comparative legal method for analysing national legislation, European Court of Human Rights decisions, and judicial practice. The study led to the following conclusions: forensic psychological examination is a comprehensive psychological study to identify the individual psychological characteristics of a participant in criminal proceedings applying a wide range of methods, one of which may be a polygraph; the decision on the use of a polygraph is made by an expert, taking into consideration technological, legal and ethical aspects; the technological aspect is that the polygraph records only the physiological reactions of the person under examination to certain stimuli, which must be assessed by the expert; the legal aspect is the presence in national legislation of clear provisions regarding the subject of a polygraph examination, the procedure for its conduct (methodology) and assessment criteria; the ethical aspect is the inadmissibility of forced or covert use of a polygraph, which provides for an explanation of the rights of the person and the procedure for obtaining written voluntary consent in accordance with the basic principle of legal proceedings – the right of a person not to testify against him or herself. The formulated provisions on the use of a polygraph are oriented towards practical use by criminal proceedings participants
Forensic psychological examination with the use of polygraph as a means of proof
Abstract
Keywords
criminal proceeding; traces of psychological origin; physiological processes; expert research; source of evidence; polygram
- Bowcott, O. (2020). Lie detectors should be used to monitor sex offenders, UK study says. Retrieved from https:// www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/mar/18/lie-detectors-should-be-used-to-monitor-sex-offenders-ukstudy-says.
- Butenko, O.V. (2022). Legal status of the initiator and the person granting permission to conduct a polygraph test. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 12(2), 16-23. doi: 10.56215/04221202.16.
- Case No. 194/342/22 of Terniv City Court of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. (2023, January). Retrieved from https:// court.gov.ua/fair/sud0440/.
- Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. (2022). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/465117#Text.
- Degtyarenko, T.V., & Kovylina, V.G. (2022). Psychophysiology of development: A textbook for students of higher educational institutions. Kyiv: UAID “Rada”.
- Elaad, E. (2016). The validity of the guilty knowledge test in real-life criminal cases. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(6), 501-518. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2016.1168428.
- Forensic Psychological Expertise. (2020). Expertise to establish the awareness of a participant in the process about the event or its details and the psychological attitude to conceal or distort information that is important for the case. Forensic psychological expertise: Application of the polygraph and special knowledge in legal practice. Retrieved from https://expertize-journal.org.ua/ekspertiza-s-poligrafom/35-ekspertiza-dostovernostisoobshchaemykh-uchastnikom-protsessa-informatsii.
- Graham, M. (2023). Lie detector polygraph testing. Retrieved from https://www.stoneking.co.uk/sectors/ personal-law/criminal-law/sexual-offending-and-online-safety/lie-detector-polygraph-testing.
- Hradun, S.A. (2023). Discussion issues of the use of polygraph in criminal proceedings. Law Journal of Donbass, 2(83), 39-44. doi: 10.32782/2523-4269-2023-83-39-44.
- Iacono, W.G. (2001). Forensic “lie detection”: Procedures without scientific basis. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 1(1), 75-86. doi: 10.1300/J158v01n01_05.
- James-Civetta, M. (2019). Polygraph test FAQs. Retrieved from https://surl.li/hybkuo.
- Kabanets, O. (2023). The use of a computer polygraph (lie detector) in criminal proceedings through the prism of judicial practice. Retrieved from https://www.hsa.org.ua/blog/vikoristannia-kompiuternogo-poligrafadetektora-brexni-u-kriminalnomu-provadzenni-cerez-prizmu-sudovoyi-praktiki.
- Kassin, S.M., Drizin, S.A., Grisso, T., Gudjonsson, G.H., Leo, R.A., & Redlich, A.D. (2010). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior, 34(1), 3-38. doi: 10.1007/s10979009-9188-6.
- Katwala, A. (2020). Lie detectors are creeping into UK policing and they still don’t work. Retrieved from https:// www.wired.com/story/uk-police-polygraph-lie-detector-terrorism/.
- Klymenko, V.V. (2021). Psychophysiological foundations of professional resilience. In Psychophysiological regularities of hardiness of specialists in socio-economic professions (pp. 33-34). Kyiv: V. Kundelska.
- Kohutych, I. (2011). The polygraph in Poland and Ukraine: History, current state, and prospects. Wrocław-Lviv Legal Journal, 2, 92-116.
- Kolyada, N.V. (2022). Psychophysiology. Sumy: Sumy State University.
- Kurman, O.V., & Balybina, A.R. (2024). The use of polygraph in the investigation of criminal offenses: Problems of tactics and legal regulation. Analytical and Comparative Law, 2, 686-691. doi: 10.24144/27886018.2024.02.114.
- Law of Poland No. 89, Item 555 “Code of Criminal Procedure”. (1997, June). Retrieved from http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU19970890555/U/D19970555Lj.pdf.
- Law of Ukraine No. 4038-XII “On Forensic Expertise”. (1994, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/4038-12#Text.
- Marina, Yu. (2023). Some features of the use of the polygraph in criminal proceedings in Ukraine and the world. Scientific Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, 4, 191-194. doi: 10.31733/2078-35662023-4-191-194.
- Minka, T.P. (2023). European experience in using the polygraph: Ways to improve administrative and legal regulation for Ukraine. Legal Position, 4(41), 145-147. doi: 10.32782/2521-6473.2023-4.29.
- Motlyakh, O.I. (2021). Admissibility and evidentiary nature of the results of psychophysiological examination with the use of a polygraph. Academic Bulletin of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 3, 7-15. doi: 10.33270/01211203.7.
- Order of Ministry of Justice of Ukraine No. 53/5 “On Approval of the Instructions on the Appointment and Conduct of Forensic Examinations and Expert Studies and Scientific and Methodological Recommendations on the Preparation and Appointment of Forensic Examinations and Expert Studies”. (1998, October). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98.
- Order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine No. 1350/5 “On Amendments to the Order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine dated 8 October 1998 No. 53/5”. (2015, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/z0915-15#n353.
- Provincial Court of British Columbia. (2016). Polygraph tests. Retrieved from https://www.provincialcourt.bc.ca/navigating-court-case/information-all-types-cases/courtroom-basics/evidence-and-oaths/polygraphtests.
- Psychodiagnostic Methods. (2023). Retrieved from https://psyhology.space/psypedia-post/metodykypsyhodiagnostyky/.
- Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 595-p “On approval of the Procedure for Certification and State Registration of Methods for Conducting Forensic Examinations”. (2008, July). Retrieved from https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/595-2008-%D0%BF#Text.
- Slowik, S.M. (2020). Critical changes over the 100-year evolution of polygraph practices. European Polygraph, 14(1(51)), 50-57. doi: 10.2478/EP-2020-0010.
- Types of forensic psychological examinations. (2025). Retrieved from https://cmhmda.org.ua/sudovoekspertna-diyalnist-instytutu-sudovoyi-psyhiatriyi/sudovo-psyhologichna-ekspertyza/vydy-sudovopsyhologichnyh-ekspertyz.
- Vavryniv, O. (2023). Organization and conduct of psychological and socio-psychological research: A practical guide. Lviv: Lviv State University of Internal Affairs.
- Widacki, M. (2023). Notes on the margins of the Ukrainian methodological notebook on polygraph research conducted to identify Russian saboteurs and agents. Internal Security Review, 28(15), 389-402. doi: 10.4467/20801335PBW.23.017.17667.
- Zlatina-Kotkova, O.H. (2018). Problems of personnel attitudes to polygraph testing. Forensic psychological examination. Application of Polygraph and Special Knowledge in Legal Practice: Electronic Journal, 6, 389-402.
- Zubovskyi, D.S. (2017). Japan’s experience in conducting psychophysiological studies using a polygraph. Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 22(2), 355-368.
Volobuyev, A., Orlova, T., Osyka, I., & Sielicki, D.
(2025).
Forensic psychological examination with the use of polygraph as a means of proof.
Philosophy, Economics and Law Review,
5(2),
36-45.
https://doi.org/10.63341/2786-491X-2025-2-36