The purpose of the study was to examine post-anarchism as a critique of standard ideologies of power and to assess its potential for social transformation. The study was conducted from September 2024 to February 2025, employing a post-structuralist analysis of power, political identity, and social structures. The findings indicated that post-anarchism conceptualises power not as a fixed hierarchical structure, but as a flexible process shaped through multiple social interactions. Post-anarchist theories demonstrate that the rejection of centralised mechanisms of authority becomes conceivable when alternative forms of social coordination are developed, based on principles of autonomy, mutual aid, and direct democracy. The analysis of contemporary initiatives, including horizontal networks and digital communities, demonstrated that post-anarchist approaches may contribute to the emergence of new models of civic engagement, although they remain vulnerable to latent forms of power arising from cultural and economic dependencies. Several paradoxes within post-anarchist models are identified, particularly the impossibility of completely eliminating power, even within highly decentralised structures. The results confirmed that post-anarchism simultaneously critiques conventional forms of authority while recognising the necessity of certain regulatory mechanisms to maintain social cohesion. The study further showed that in response to the challenges of globalisation and digitalisation, post-anarchism places emphasis on flexible, contextually adaptive forms of political subjectivity that may shift according to situational demands. Limitations of the post-anarchist perspective in addressing social equality were observed, since the absence of universal standards poses risks of newly emerging inequalities, which arise naturally from asymmetries in resources and access to information. Nevertheless, post-anarchism offers valuable opportunities for critical reflection on political freedom and autonomy within contemporary post-structural realities. The conclusions may inform further analysis of the transformative potential of post-structuralist theories of power, the rethinking of political identity models, and the development of strategies aimed at fostering more flexible and open social structures
Theories of post-anarchism: Post-structuralism in political philosophy
Abstract
Keywords
deconstruction; discourse; horizontality; hierarchy; relativism
[1] Alston, E. (2022). Blockchain and the law-legality, law-like characteristics, and legal applications. In J.L. Caton (Ed.), The economics of blockchain and cryptocurrency (pp. 117-144). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781800882348.00014.
[2] Bekhter, O. (2024). The impact of horizontal and vertical management structures on personnel management effectiveness and working conditions in modern organizations. Young Scientist, 7(131), 210-214. doi: 10.32839/2304-5809/2024-7-131-6.
[3] Campbell, D., & Bleiker, R. (2024). Poststructuralism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, K. Kušić & S. Smith (Eds.), International relations theories: Discipline and diversity (pp. 196-218). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/hepl/9780192866455.003.0013.
[4] Christoyannopoulos, A. (2022). An anarcho-pacifist reading of international relations: A normative critique of international politics from the confluence of pacifism and anarchism. International Studies Quarterly, 66(4), article number sqac070. doi: 10.1093/isq/sqac070.
[5] Declarations of the Lacandon Jungle. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://radiozapatista.org/?page_ id=20278&lang=en.
[6] Derrida, J. (1987). Of grammatology. Baltimore, London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
[7] Desert. (2011). Retrieved from https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/anonymous-desert.
[8] Dzierwa, R. (2025). Autonomy in stratified structures. Studia Humana, 14(1), 15-27. doi: 10.2478/sh-2025- 0002.
[9] Fighting in the New Terrain. What’s changed since the 20th century. (2010). Retrieved from https:// uk.crimethinc.com/2010/08/23/fighting-in-the-new-terrain.
[10] Fong, B.C. (2023). Leaderless movements? Rethinking leaders, spontaneity, and organisation-ness. Political Science, 75(2), 105-121. doi: 10.1080/00323187.2023.2259396.
[11] Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Vintage.
[12] Foucault, M. (1976). The history of sexuality, Volume 1: An introduction. London: Vintage.
[13] Friends of the Earth International. (2025). Climate and biodiversity in freefall. How policy failures accelerate the polycrisis. Retrieved from https://www.foei.org/publication/climate-and-biodiversity-in-freefall/.
[14] Horizontal Organizational Structure. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.aihr.com/hr-glossary/horizontal-organizational-structure/.
[15] Janssen, J. (2024). Hope springs eternal: Political engagement in a post-anarchist utopia. Utopian Studies, 35(1), 25-46. doi: 10.5325/utopianstudies.35.1.0025.
[16] Kallin, H. (2024). Henri Lefebvre and the spatial revolution that never ends: Towards the reconciliation of anarchist and Marxist approaches in geography?. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, article number e12726. doi: 10.1111/tran.12726.
[17] Kinna, R. (2024). Anarchism and the politics of utopia. In L. Davis & R. Kinna (Eds.), Anarchism and utopianism (pp. 441-476). Manchester: Manchester University Press. doi: 10.7765/9781526183705.00023.
[18] Kummelstedt, C. (2023). The role of hierarchy in realizing collective leadership in a self-managing organization. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 36, 355-375. doi: 10.1007/s11213-022-09615-x.
[19] Lacan, J. (2023). From an Other to the other, Book XVI. Milton: Polity.
[20] Lührmann, A., Marquardt, K.L., & Mechkova, V. (2020). Constraining governments: New indices of vertical, horizontal, and diagonal accountability. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 811-820. doi: 10.1017/ S0003055420000222.
[21] MacGilvray, E. (2021). Liberal freedom, the separation of powers, and the administrative state. Social Philosophy and Policy, 38(1), 130-151. doi: 10.1017/S026505252100025X.
[22] Malabou, C. (2022). Cynicism and anarchism in Foucault’s last seminars. In P. Osborne (Ed.), Afterlives transcendentals, universals, others (pp. 146-162). London: CRMEP Books.
[23] Mau, S. (2021). “The mute compulsion of economic relations”: Towards a Marxist theory of the abstract and impersonal power of capital. Historical Materialism, 29(3), 3-32. doi: 10.1163/1569206X-29031234.
[24] Mishchenko, V. (2023). Functioning of decentralized markets based on the web 3.0 platform. Economic Space, 184, 50-57. doi: 10.32782/2224-6282/184-8.
[25] Mishra, P. (2025). What is a horizontal organizational structure. Retrieved from https://www.pmapstest.com/ blog/horizontal-organizational-structure.
[26] Mullenite, J. (2021). Toward broader anarchist geographies: Space/place, nation/state, and anarchist scholarship. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 20(2), 206-213. doi: 10.14288/acme. v20i2.1949.
[27] Newman, S. (2024). Anarchism, utopianism and the politics of emancipation. In L. Davis & R. Kinna (Eds.), Anarchism and utopianism (pp. 207-220). Manchester: Manchester University Press. doi: 10.7765/9781526183705.00022.
[28] Newman, S., & Torre, M. (2024). The anarchist before the law: Law without authority. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. doi: 10.1515/9781399513203.
[29] Pavliuchenko, A.M. (2020). Postanarchism as a philosophy of radical politics. Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series Philosophy. Philosophical Peripeteias, 63, 34-43. doi: 10.26565/2226-0994-2020-63-4.
[30] Pedchenko, M.Y. (2024). Research of the axiological foundations of the network society in the context of transformational processes of postmodernity. Educational Discourse: Collection of Scientific Papers, 50(7-9), 46-54. doi: 10.33930/ed.2019.5007.50(7-9)-7.
[31] Rahimi, H., & Rahimi, H. (2022). Deleuze and contemporary planning theory: Neither state nor traditional anarchism. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 15(38), 235-246. doi: 10.22034/ aaud.2022.220148.2133.
[32] Rasit, H., & Kolokotronis, A. (2020). Decentralist vanguards: Women’s autonomous power and left convergence in Rojava. Globalizations, 17(5), 869-883. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2020.1722498.
[33] Rusche, J. (2022). Imagining peace outside of liberal statebuilding: Anarchist theory as pathway to emancipatory peacefacilitation. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 47(1), 18-44. doi: 10.1177/03043754221074618.
[34] Schaaf, M., & Quiring, O. (2023). The limits of social media mobilization: How protest movements adapt to social media logic. Media and Communication, 11(3), 203-213. doi: 10.17645/mac.v11i3.6635.
[35] Sotiropoulos, G. (2020). Between order and insurgency: Post-structuralism and the problem of justice. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 47(7), 850-872. doi: 10.1177/0191453720931905.
[36] The Invisible Committee. (2009). The coming insurrection. Retrieved from https://mitpress.mit. edu/9781584350804/the-coming-insurrection/.
[37] Tkalya, O.V. (2024). The essence of state power and its main properties. Actual Problems of National Jurisprudence, 1, 230-235. doi: 10.32782/2408-9257-2024-1-42.
[38] Topuzovski, T. (2024). Postanarchism and critical art practices. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
[39] Ugryn, L.Y., & Bevza, B.P. (2022). Self-identification of citizens as a key factor of instability of party system in Ukraine. Regional Studies, 29, 88-94. doi: 10.32782/2663-6170/2022.29.14.
[40] Valliere, R.W. (2023). What is the future for post-structuralist anarchism?. Philosophies, 8(4), article number 63. doi: 10.3390/philosophies8040063.
[41] Wegner, D., & Verschoore, J. (2021). Network governance in action: Functions and practices to foster collaborative environments. Administration & Society, 54(3), 479-499. doi: 10.1177/00953997211024580.
[42] Williams, A., & Srnicek, N. (2013). #ACCELERATE MANIFESTO for an accelerationist politics. Retrieved from https://criticallegalthinking.com/2013/05/14/accelerate-manifesto-for-an-accelerationist-politics/.