Alienation constitutes a critical issue in contemporary discourse, intensified by globalisation, digitalisation, technological advancement, social fragmentation, and escalating political instability. The relevance of this inquiry derives from the urgent need to conceptualise the processes through which individuals experience estrangement from their essence, from social institutions, and the broader existential framework of human life. The primary aim of this study was to reconstruct the historical and philosophical evolution of the concept of “alienation”, identify its principal stages of development, and examine its contemporary reinterpretations within the context of global transformations. Methodologically, the research was grounded in historical-philosophical analysis, comparative methodology, hermeneutic interpretation of primary philosophical sources, and interdisciplinary integration of perspectives from philosophy, sociology, cultural studies, and political theory. The study results revealed that alienation initially emerged as a metaphysical concern in ancient philosophy, reflecting humanity’s disrupted relationship with the Cosmos. During the medieval period, it was reinterpreted theologically as a rupture between humanity and the divine. The Early Modern era marked a pivotal shift, with alienation acquiring political and legal significance within the framework of social contract theory. In the nineteenth century, German classical philosophy and Marxism endowed the concept with systematic philosophical depth. In the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, alienation has been further elaborated through social, cultural, existential, and technological dimensions, encompassing phenomena such as digital subjectivity, posthumanist critiques, and algorithmic governance. The practical significance of the research lies in its applicability to contemporary academic and policy discussions within social philosophy, political theory, cultural studies, and education
The phenomenon of alienation in the historico-philosophical discourse: Evolution of the concept and contemporary interpretations
Abstract
Keywords
alienation; spirituality; historical development; self-alienation; sociocultural context; society
[1] Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
[2] Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: SAGE.
[3] Bhabha, H.K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
[4] Braidotti, R. (2017). Posthuman knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.
[5] Choquet, P.L. (2021). Alienation and the task of geo-social critique. European Journal of Social Theory, 24(1), 105-122. doi: 10.1177/1368431020926113.
[6]Dodonova, V., Dodonov, R., & Maidaniuk, I. (2024). Hierarchy of identities in modern humanitarian discourse. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 12(2), 252-261. doi: 10.31548/hspedagog15(2).2024.252-261.
[7]Esposito, R. (2011). Immunitas: The protection and negation of life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
[8]Fanciullo, J. (2025). Alienation, engagement, and welfare. The Philosophical Quarterly, 75(1), 40-60. doi: 10.1093/pq/pqad115.
[9]Feuerbach, L. (1986). Principles of philosophy of the future. Indianapolis-Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
[10] Freud, S. (1976). Psychology of the unconscious. Zurich: Ex Libris Book Club.
[11] Fromm, E. (2013). To have or to be?. London, New York: Bloomsbury.
[12] Han, B.-C. (2015). The burnout society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
[13] Hayles, N.K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
[14] Hegel, G.W.F. (2018). The phenomenology of spirit. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781139050494.
[15] Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
[16] Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan, or the matter, forme, and power of a common-wealth ecclesiastical and civil. London: Printed for Andrew Crooke.
[17] Jing, Z. (2024). The enigma of survival: The сoncept of “Alienation” and its cultural interpretation. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 8(4), 883-890. doi: 10.26855/jhass.2024.04.011.
[18] Liu, Z.W. (2022). Marcuse’s utopian transcendence of “One-way man”. Theory Horizon, 7(10), 30-36.
[19] Locke, J. (1823). Two treatises of government (Vol. V). London: Printed for Thomas Tegg.
[20] Ma, L. (2024). Alienation in the digital age: Philosophical reflections and exploration. Philosophy and Social Science, 1(9), 62-66. doi: 10.62381/P243911.
[21] Marcuse, H. (1991). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. London and New York: Beacon Press.
[22] Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2022). The German ideology. Paris: Foreign Languages Press.
[23] Marx, K. (1970). Critique of Hegel’s “Philosophy of right”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[24] Marx, K. (2007). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. New York: Dover Publications.
[25] Osborne, T.M. (2014). Human action in Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, and William of Ockham. Washington: Catholic University of America Press. doi: 10.2307/j.ctt5vj8fm.
[26] Øversveen, E., & Kelly, C.A. (2023). Labour, capital and the struggle over history: Reconstructing Marxist class theory from the standpoint of alienation. European Journal of Social Theory, 26(3), 317-334. doi: 10.1177/13684310221129981.
[27] Pateman, J. (2022). V.I. Lenin on Alienation. Critical Sociology, 49(2), 185-200. doi: 10.1177/08969205221080552.
[28] Rousseau, J.-J. (1998). The social contract. London: Penguin Classics.
[29] Samuel, J. (2023). Alienation and the metaphysics of normativity: On the quality of our relations with the world. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 26(1), 158-191. doi: 10.26556/jesp.v26i1.1889.
[30] Santiagu, M.K. (2024). Understanding alienation: A marxian perspective. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 11(3), 88-95.
[31] Sartre, J.-P. (2004). Critique of dialectical reason (Vol. 1). London, New York: Verso.
[32] Schweitzer, A. (2005). Essential writings (Modern spiritual masters). New York: Orbis Books.
[33] Stiegler, B. (2019). The age of disruption: Technology and madness in computational capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
[34] Zuboff, S. (1989). In the age of the smart machin. New York: Basic Books.