The article is devoted to the study of Nietzsche’s philosophy, namely the specifics of its metaphorical translation. The study unfolds as a systematization of Nietzsche’s metaphors. The systematization of metaphors arises from the philosopher’s main interest – the religious sphere, or rather Christianity. The principle of systematization is based on the main actors of the Christian religion: God, man, and the church. The methodological basis of the article is continued by the approach of functional typology of metaphors. This allowed us to formulate a research scheme of metaphors as a productive mechanism of classification: “analysis-criticismvision”. The author emphasizes the importance of contextual (strategic and tactical) interpretation of Nietzsche’s metaphors as a means of avoiding speculation on his philosophy. A special feature of the article is the rather extensive material of the advisory literature as a certain methodological guideline for the development of the research project on metaphors. The author is preparing material (themes and methodological formulas) to substantiate the thesis of metaphor and writing style in general as a form and method of religious criticism
Methodological and thematic outline of the research perspectives of Nietzsche’s metaphor
Abstract
Keywords
Nietzsche’s philosophy; methodology; theme; metaphor; perspective; new
[1] Briuzher, F. (2013). European dictionary of philosophies: A lexicon of untranslatability.
[2] Duncker, C. (2006). Critical reflections on the concept of ideology: The significance of ideologies for people. London: Turnshare.
[3] Fokht, Ye. (2022, April 27). Not everything is so clear: How and why russians justify the war against Ukraine. BBC NEWS Ukraine.
[4] Habermas, J. (1981). Theory of communicative action. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
[5] Hume, D. (2003). Treatise on human nature as a concept. Kyiv: Universe.
[6] Kaldor, M. (1999). New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era. Cambridge: Polity Press.
[7] Mudrakov, V. (2022). Humanitarian security: From the problems of sectoral definition to the peculiarities of didactic definition. In V. Mudrakov (Ed.), The phenomenon of security: Social and humanitarian dimensions (pp. 309-331). Khmelnytskyi: FOP Melnyk A.A.
[8] Mudrakov, V. (2022). Introduction. In V. Mudrakov (Ed.), The phenomenon of security: Social and humanitarian dimensions (pp. 9-13). Khmelnytskyi: FOP Melnyk A.A.
[9] Mudrakov, V. (2023). Identity markers of writing: Methodological tools for researching the war of identities. Philosophy and Political Science in the Context of Modern Culture, 15(1), 31-37. doi: 10.15421/352304.
[10] Mudrakov, V., Liutko, N., & Pavlyk, О. (2023). “Human” and “Ideological”: Toward an understanding of the Russian-Ukrainian war in terms of identity. Scientific Bulletin of Dnipro State University of Internal Affairs, 2, 106-114. doi: 10.31733/2078-3566-2023-2-106-114.
[11] Mudrakov, V., Polischchuk, O., Popovych, V., & Mozolev, O. (2020). Identity of Homo sovieticus in retrospective and modernity: Value and anthropological objectivations of phenomenological and literary senses. Annals of the University of Bucharest. Political Science, 22(1-2), 35-59.
[12] Prodanović, S. (2022). The structure of common sense and its relation to engagement and social change – a pragmatist account. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 51(3), 211-226. doi: 10.1515/zfsoz-2022-0016.
[13] Shaftesbury, L. (2000). Sensus communis, an essay on the freedom of wit and humour in a letter to a friend. In L. Klein (Ed.), Characteristics of men, manners, opinions, times (pp. 29-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803284.008.
[14] Yermolenko, V. (2020). Fluid ideologies. Ideas and politics in Europe in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera.