The paper discusses the effectiveness of the electronic (remote) justice model in Georgia. For this aim, public opinion has been examined taking into account the pros and cons and perspectives of remote justice. Despite the “speed and cheapnessˮ, the efficiency of a fair trial has been revealed to be low: existing videoconferencing technology affects the objectivity of the parties’ assessment of evidence and arguments, the formation of a judge’s internal belief in decision-making, and so on. A discussion proposal on a new model of remote administration of justice has been developed
Evaluating the effectiveness of the electronic (remote) justice model in Georgia in terms of exercising the right to a fair trial
Abstract
Keywords
remote justice model, model effectiveness evaluation, public opinion, law theory, management theory, decision making
- Buhl, J., & Zöfel, P. (2001). SPSS Version 10: Einführung in die moderne Datenanalyse unter Windows. Addison Wesley Imprint in der Pearson Education Deutschland GmbH. (in German)
- Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia, no. 1772. Legislative Herald of Georgia. Retrieved from https://matsne.gov.ge/en/document/view/90034?publication=106
- Donoghue, J. (2017). The rise of digital justice: Courtroom technology, public participation and access to justice. The Modern Law Review, 80(6). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2230.12300
- Gori, P., & Pahladsingh, A. (2021). Fundamental rights under COVID-19: A European perspective on videoconferencing in court. ERA Forum, 21, 561–577. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12027-020-00643-5.pdf
- Multi-annual European e-Justice action plan 2009–2013 (2009/C 75/01), Official Journal of the European Union, C 75, 1. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2009:075:TOC
- On Approval of Decree no. 1, March 21, 2020 of the President of Georgia on Measures to be Implemented in Connection with the Declaration of a State of Emergency throughout the Whole Territory of Georgia. Legislative Herald of Georgia. Retrieved from https://www.matsne.gov.ge/en/document/view/4830333?publication=0
- Recommendation of the High Council of Justice of Georgia. Retrieved from http://hcoj.gov.ge/ge/tsardgineba-2020
- Rossner, M., Tait, D., & McCurdy, M. (2021). Justice reimagined: Challenges and opportunities with implementing virtual courts. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 33(1), 1–17. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10345329.2020.1859968
- The European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). (2021). Guidelines on videoconferencing in judicial proceedings (CEPEJ(2021)4REV4). Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2021-4-guidelines-videoconference-en/1680a2c2f4
Svianadze, G.
(2022).
Evaluating the effectiveness of the electronic (remote) justice model in Georgia in terms of exercising the right to a fair trial.
Philosophy, Economics and Law Review,
2(1),
214-230.
https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2022-1-214-230