The full-scale invasion of russian troops caused the immergence in Ukrainian criminal legislation of new rules, aimed at raising the effectiveness of combating this military aggression. Among these rules one of the key ones is the article 43.1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, regulating the combat immunity. The research paper’s objective was the development of some suggestions concerning interpretation of combat immunity and the improvement of its regulation under Ukrainian criminal legislation. While conducting this research the authors used in particular the following methods: gnoseological, systemic-structural, dialectical, logic-semantic and comparative-legal. Some proposals to improve regulatory framework of circumstances excluding criminal illegality of action stipulated by the Criminal Code of Ukraine were elaborated, as well as interpretation of its some attributes. The suggestion was to exclude the definitions of “ammunitions” and “explosive materials” from the text of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, because under their content they are covered by the understanding of concepts “weapon” and “armament”. It was found that when repelling and deterring armed aggression of the russian federation or aggression of another country, it is permissible to use not only armed force, but also any other force capable of striking the enemy, and it is important that such use complies with the rules of international humanitarian law. They emphasised that actions of military personnel or civilians who used poison or other items or weapons prohibited by international humanitarian law to repel and deter the armed aggression of the russian federation, despite the fact that their actions were aimed at countering the occupiers, are subject to criminal liability under Criminal Code of Ukraine. The authors suggested to seek ways of legal possibility to use stricter, except treacherous ones, means and methods of conducting war against armies of those countries, whose armed forces do not absolutely respect rules of international humanitarian law during warfare. The practical value of this work lies in the fact that its results can be used in further research on combat immunity in criminal law, as well as in the application of certain provisions of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in the practical activities of law enforcement agencies
Some aspects of improvement of understanding combat immunity under Ukrainian criminal legislation
Abstract
Keywords
laws and customs of war; means of warfare; weapon; armament; circumstances, excluding criminal unlawfulness of action
- Amarasinghe, K. (2021). The shape of war in the 21-st century: An analysis of the challenges posed by the contemporary armed conflicts with reference to international humanitarian law. International Journal of Law, 7(1), 1-6.
- Antonyuk, N. (2022). A criminal and legal assessment of collaborationism: A change of views in connection with Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 5(3), 139.
- Begunts, A. (2022). Criminal law characterization of civil combat immunity. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 72(2), 116-120. doi: 10.24144/2307-3322.2022.72.51.
- Biszczanik, М. (2024). The inadmissibility of jurisdictional immunity of persons responsible for the commission of international crimes in terms of domestic universal jurisdiction proceedings. Polish Yearbook of International Law, 43, 311-321. doi:10.24425/pyil.2024.152304.
- Blanchard, A., & Taddeo, M. (2022). Jus in bello necessity, the requirement of minimal force, and autonomous weapons systems. Journal of Military Ethics, 21(3-4), 286-303. doi: 10.1080/15027570.2022.2157952.
- Bosch, S. (2024). Exploring the international humanitarian law status of foreign fighters in the Ukrainian international legion of territorial defence. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 27, 1-20. doi: 10.17159/17273781/2024/v27i0a14600.
- Botnarenko, I., & Kryzhna, V. (2024). Means of warfare as a subject of a criminal offense provided for in Article 438 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (violation of the laws and customs of war). New Ukrainian Law, 2, 122131. doi: 10.51989/NUL.2024.2.16.
- Busel, V.T. (Ed.). (2005). Large explanatory dictionary of the modern Ukrainian language: 250,000 entries (1st ed.). Kyiv; Irpin: VTF Perun.
- Case No. 183/5056/22 of the Novomoskovsk City District Court of Dnipropetrovsk Region. (2022, November). Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/107311829.
- Ciminal Code of Ukraine. (2001, April). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text.
- Ciminal Code of Ukraine. (2025, April). Retrieved from https://newcriminalcode.org.ua/upload/ media/2025/04/03/00-kontrolnyj-proyekt-kk-02-04-2025.pdf.
- Ciobanu, C. (2024). Poland passes law granting soldiers immunity when using firearms at Belarus border. Retrieved from https://balkaninsight.com/2024/07/29/poland-passes-law-granting-soldiers-immunitywhen-using-firearms-at-belarus-border/.
- Contino, M.D., & Kuersten, A. (2023). The federal tort claims act (FTCA): A legal overview. Retrieved from https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R45732.pdf.
- Criminal Code of the Republic of Poland. (1997, April). Retrieved from https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/ download.xsp/WDU19970880553/U/D19970553Lj.pdf.
- Defense Code. Book I: General Status of the Military. (2025, July). Retrieved from https://www.legifrance.gouv. fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006071307/LEGISCTA000006137720/.
- Dinstein, Y. (2022). The conduct of hostilities under the law of international armed conflict (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781009106191.
- Frowe, H. (2023). The ethics of war and peace: An introduction. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.doi: 10.4324/9780203808160.
- German Criminal Code. (1998, Novermber). Retrieved from https://dejure.org/gesetze/StGB.
- Holubosh, V.V. (2020). Criminal liability for crimes against public safety involving weapons, ammunition, explosives and explosive devices (Articles 262, 263, 263-1, 264 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine): Monograph. Ivano-Frankivsk: Symphonia forte.
- Kleczkowska, A. (2023). Autonomous weapons and the right to self-defence. Israel Law Review, 56(1), 24-40. doi: 10.1017/S002122372200019X.
- Korabel, M.H., & Pavlenko, T.A. (2024). Criminal law. General part. Educational and methodological complex. Kharkiv: H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University.
- Law of Poland No. 1228 “On Amendments to the Law – the Criminal Code and Certain Other Laws”. (2024, June). Retrieved from https://dziennikustaw.gov.pl/D2024000122801.pdf.
- Law of Ukraine No. 1932-XII “On the Defense of Ukraine”. (1991, December). Retrieved from https://zakon. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1932-12#Text.
- Law of Ukraine No. 1991-III “On State Support for Enterprises, Research Institutes and Organizations that Develop and Manufacture Ammunition, Their Elements and Special Chemical Products”. (2000, September). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1991-14#Text.
- Law of Ukraine No. 2114-IX “On Ensuring the Participation of Civilians in the Defense of Ukraine”. (2022, March). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2114-20#Text.
- Law of Ukraine No. 2288-IV “On the Handling of Explosive Materials for Industrial Purposes”. (2004, December). Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2288-15.
- Law on the Legal Status of Soldiers (1956, March). Retrieved from https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/sg/ BJNR001140956.html.
- Mamedov, G., & Khekalo, V. (2025). International legal regulation of the concept of combat immunity and its application in the conditions of the armed conflict in Ukraine. International Scientific Journal “Military Science”, 2(4), 188-205. doi: 10.62524/msj.2024.2.4.16.
- Mulcahy v Ministry of Defence. (1996, February). Retrieved from https://www.lawteacher.net/cases/ mulcahy-v-mod.php?vref=1.
- Multiple Claimants v Ministry of Defence. (2003, May). Retrieved from https://www.casemine.com/judgement/ uk/5b46f2172c94e0775e7f2184#:~:text=The%20Claimants%20are%20former%20members%20of%20 the%20Armed,to%20prevent%2C%20detect%2C%20diagnose%2C%20or%20treat%20such%20illnesses.
- Order of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine of No. 164 “On Approval of the Instructions on the Procedure for Implementing the Norms of International Humanitarian Law in the Armed Forces of Ukraine”. (2017, March). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0704-17#Text.
- Order of the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine No. 56/m “On Approval of the Instructions on the Procedure for the Seizure and Transfer for Storage to the Internal Affairs Bodies of Firearms and Other Weapons and Ammunition Seized from Violators of Environmental Legislation”. (2003, March) Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0298-03.
- Paphiti, A. (2014). UK Armed Forces personnel and the legal framework for future operations. Retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmdfence/writev/futureops/law06.htm.
- Prikhodko, P. (2022). A grandmother in Mariupol poisoned two occupiers with pies – they left for Russia in zinc coffins. Retrieved from https://www.dialog.ua/ukr/war/252242_1653125902.
- Ptashchenko, D. (2022). Fulfillment of the duty to protect the Motherland, independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine (Article 43-1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine): Certain features of legislative regulation. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 4, 520-532. doi: 10.30525/978-9934-26-223-4-158.
- Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine No. 3 “On Judicial Practice in Cases of Theft and Other Illegal Handling of Weapons, Ammunition, Explosives, Explosive Devices or Radioactive Materials”. (2002, April). Retrieved from http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0003700-02.
Rosenzweig, I. (2024). “When you have to shoot, shoot!” Rethinking the right to life of combatants during armed conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross, 106(926), 863-896. doi: 10.1017/S181638312400016X.- Sharmar, О. (2022). Fulfillment of the obligation to protect the Matherland, independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine as a circumstance that excludes criminal wrongfulness of the act. Herald of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine, 1(17), 24-35. doi: 10.21564/2311-9640.2022.17.257792.
- Shchcerbyna, N. (2024). Understanding the concept of “weapon” in the general part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 3, 445-448. doi: 10.32782/2524-0374/2024-3/107.
- Smith and Others v Ministry of Defence. (2013, June). Retrieved from https://www.casemine.com/judgement/ uk/5b46f2172c94e0775e7f2184#:~:text=The%20Claimants%20are%20former%20members%20of%20 the%20Armed,to%20prevent%2C%20detect%2C%20diagnose%2C%20or%20treat%20such%20illnesses.
- Stephan, P. (2022). The crisis in international law and the path forward for international humanitarian law. International Review of the Red Cross, 104(920-921), 2077-2096. doi: 10.1017/S1816383122000285.
- Trostyuk, Z.A. (2000). The concept device of Ukraine Criminal Codex Special Part. (PhD dissertation, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine).
- Voznyuk, А., & Zhuk, І. (2022). General characteristics of signs of objective side of a violation of laws and customs of war. Bulletin of the Penitentiary Association of Ukraine, 4(22), 5-19. doi: 10.34015/2523-4552.2022.4.01.
- War crimes of the Russian Federation against Ukraine: The Office of the Prosecutor General spoke about the most common ones. (2025). Retrieved from https://unn.ua/en/news/war-crimes-of-the-russian-federationagainst-ukraine-the-office-of-the-prosecutor-general-spoke-about-the-most-common-ones.
- Yakoviyk, I., Kharytonov, S., & Zaytsev, O. (2024). Combatant immunity and the Russian-Ukrainian war: Reopening the debate on a longstanding doctrine. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 7(4), 38-66.
- Zubansky, M. (2023). Legal restrictions in the choice of methods and means of warfare. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 2(78), 180-185. doi: 10.24144/2307-3322.2023.78.2.28.
Khashev, V., & Antonyan, R.
(2025).
Some aspects of improvement of understanding combat immunity under Ukrainian criminal legislation.
Philosophy, Economics and Law Review,
5(2),
60-70.
https://doi.org/10.63341/2786-491X-2025-2-60